The Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats tell the story of a thrilling showdown that kept basketball fans on the edge of their seats. From the opening tip-off to the final buzzer, this clash showcased intense rivalries, explosive plays, and standout performances that defined the night. Every basket, assist, and defensive stop contributed to the electric atmosphere, making it a must-watch contest for NBA enthusiasts eager to witness greatness unfold on the court.
As we dive deeper into the analysis, the spotlight naturally turns to the player stats match Cavaliers Cleveland vs Pacers, which reveal the true impact of each starâs performance. These numbers go beyond the scoreboard, illustrating how precision shooting, clutch rebounds, and critical defensive efforts shaped the outcome. Whether youâre a passionate Pacers supporter or a dedicated Cavs fan, the detailed breakdown ahead captures all the excitement and importance of this memorable matchup.
Team Stats Overview: Pacers Vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
In this lopsided affair, the Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats reveal Indianaâs dominance across multiple categories, outshooting the Cavaliers from deep and forcing 18 turnovers while committing just 10 themselves. The Pacersâ fast-break points (32) were a game-changer, exploiting Clevelandâs transition defense lapses. The Cavs, known for their elite regular-season defense, allowed a season-high 129 points, underscoring vulnerabilities exposed in the playoffs. Here’s a comparative breakdown:
| Category | Indiana Pacers | Cleveland Cavaliers |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 129 | 109 |
| Field Goals Made/Att | 48/88 (54.5%) | 41/92 (44.6%) |
| Three-Pointers Made/Att | 18/35 (51.4%) | 10/32 (31.3%) |
| Free Throws Made/Att | 15/20 (75.0%) | 17/22 (77.3%) |
| Rebounds | 48 | 42 |
| Assists | 28 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 18 |
| Steals | 12 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
| Points in Paint | 52 | 48 |
| Fast Break Points | 32 | 14 |
| Bench Points | 42 | 28 |
The Pacers’ superior shooting efficiency and ball security were pivotal, as they converted 51.4% of their threesâwell above their season averageâwhile Cleveland shot a dismal 31.3% from distance.
Player Stats â Indiana Pacers
đ Offense
The Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats highlight how the Pacers’ offense hummed like a well-oiled machine, with Tyrese Haliburton orchestrating a clinic in playmaking and scoring. Pascal Siakam provided the interior muscle, while sharpshooters like Andrew Nembhard stretched the floor. Their ball movement created 28 assists on 48 made baskets, emphasizing unselfish play.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrese Haliburton | 36 | 28 | 6 | 12 | 10/18 (55.6%) | 6/11 (54.5%) | 2/2 (100%) | 2 |
| Pascal Siakam | 34 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 9/15 (60.0%) | 2/4 (50.0%) | 4/5 (80.0%) | 1 |
| Myles Turner | 28 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 7/12 (58.3%) | 2/5 (40.0%) | 2/2 (100%) | 0 |
| Andrew Nembhard | 29 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 6/10 (60.0%) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 0/0 (N/A) | 1 |
| Bennedict Mathurin | 22 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 5/9 (55.6%) | 3/5 (60.0%) | 2/3 (66.7%) | 2 |
| Obi Toppin (Bench) | 18 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 7/11 (63.6%) | 1/3 (33.3%) | 3/3 (100%) | 1 |
đĄď¸ Defense
Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats show that Indiana’s defense was opportunistic, racking up 12 steals and 6 blocks while holding Cleveland under 110 points for the first time in the series. Turner anchored the paint, swatting shots and grabbing boards, while Haliburton’s quick hands disrupted passing lanes.
| Player | MIN | STL | BLK | DEF REB | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrese Haliburton | 36 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Pascal Siakam | 34 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Myles Turner | 28 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Andrew Nembhard | 29 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Aaron Nesmith | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| T.J. McConnell (Bench) | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
đ Special Teams
While basketball lacks traditional “special teams,” the Pacers’ bench unit acted as the ultimate X-factor, contributing 42 points and providing rest for starters without missing a beat. Their energy in loose balls and second-chance opportunities (12 offensive rebounds leading to 16 second-chance points) mirrored special teams’ hustle.
| Bench Player | MIN | PTS | REB | Impact Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obi Toppin | 18 | 18 | 5 | 7/11 FG, +15 plus/minus |
| T.J. McConnell | 15 | 10 | 3 | 4 AST, 2 STL |
| Isaiah Jackson | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 BLK, 3 OFF REB |
Player Stats â Cleveland Cavaliers
đ Offense
Cleveland’s offense sputtered without consistent support for Donovan Mitchell, who carried the load but couldn’t overcome poor perimeter shooting. Jarrett Allen provided some post presence, but the team managed only 22 assists amid 18 turnovers.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donovan Mitchell | 38 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 12/25 (48.0%) | 4/12 (33.3%) | 4/5 (80.0%) | 4 |
| Jarrett Allen | 32 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 8/13 (61.5%) | 0/0 (N/A) | 2/2 (100%) | 2 |
| Darius Garland | 34 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 5/14 (35.7%) | 2/7 (28.6%) | 2/2 (100%) | 3 |
| Evan Mobley | 30 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 5/11 (45.5%) | 0/1 (0.0%) | 2/4 (50.0%) | 2 |
| Max Strus | 25 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3/8 (37.5%) | 2/6 (33.3%) | 2/2 (100%) | 1 |
| Caris LeVert (Bench) | 20 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 5/9 (55.6%) | 1/3 (33.3%) | 1/1 (100%) | 3 |
đĄď¸ Defense
The Cavs’ vaunted defense faltered, allowing 18 threes and getting outrebounded 48-42. Allen and Mobley combined for 21 rebounds but couldn’t contest Indiana’s hot shooting, while perimeter defenders were burned in transition.
| Player | MIN | STL | BLK | DEF REB | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donovan Mitchell | 38 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jarrett Allen | 32 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Darius Garland | 34 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Evan Mobley | 30 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Isaac Okoro | 22 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dean Wade (Bench) | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
đ Special Teams
Cleveland’s bench was outmatched, scoring just 28 points and struggling with turnovers (8 from reserves). Their second-unit defense allowed 22 fast-break points, highlighting a lack of cohesion that special teams would need to shore up in future games.
| Bench Player | MIN | PTS | REB | Impact Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caris LeVert | 20 | 12 | 2 | 5/9 FG, but 3 TO |
| Sam Merrill | 16 | 8 | 1 | 2/5 3PT, +5 AST |
| Craig Porter Jr. | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 STL, poor plus/minus -12 |
Top Performers of the Game: Pacers Vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
- Tyrese Haliburton (Pacers, PG): Dropped 28 points and dished 12 assists, shooting 6-of-11 from three. His +22 plus/minus and zero turnovers in crunch time earned him game MVP honors.
- Donovan Mitchell (Cavaliers, SG): Scored a team-high 32 points but needed more help; his 4 turnovers in the fourth quarter were costly.
- Pascal Siakam (Pacers, PF): Double-double with 24 points and 10 rebounds, dominating the glass and paint against Cleveland’s bigs.
- Jarrett Allen (Cavaliers, C): 18 points and 12 boards, but foul trouble limited his impact in key stretches.
- Obi Toppin (Pacers, Bench): 18 points off the bench on efficient 7-of-11 shooting, sparking a crucial third-quarter run.
These standouts embodied the game’s narrative: Indiana’s collective brilliance vs. Cleveland’s reliance on one star.
Key Takeaways & Analysis: Pacers Vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
The Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats highlight how this blowout exposed Cleveland’s overdependence on Mitchellâwhen teams pack the paint and dare others to shoot, the Cavs crumble, as evidenced by their 10-of-32 from three. Indiana’s pace (102 possessions) overwhelmed a Cavs defense ranked No. 1 in the regular season but vulnerable to transition (32 fast-break points allowed). Haliburton’s mastery in pick-and-roll sets created mismatches, while Siakam and Turner’s spacing punished switches. For Cleveland, Garland’s inefficiency (5-of-14) and 18 turnovers highlight execution issues under playoff pressure. Positively, the Pacers’ bench depth (42 points) proved they can sustain leads without starters. Statistically, Indiana’s 51.4% three-point shooting was unsustainable long-term, but their 28 assists show sustainable ball-sharing. This game shifts series momentum firmly to Indy, forcing Cleveland to rethink rotations and perimeter D. Overall, it was a masterclass in playoff adaptability from the underdogs.
Whatâs Next for Both Teams
For the Indiana Pacers, a win here cements their 3-1 series lead, setting up a potential closeout game in Cleveland. With Haliburton healthy and the offense firing, they eye the Eastern Conference Finals against the winner of the other semifinalâlikely a rematch with familiar foes. Rest and film study will be key to maintaining their shooting stroke.
The Cleveland Cavaliers face do-or-die pressure, needing to win Game 5 at home to extend the series. Adjustments like more minutes for Okoro on Haliburton and better bench involvement could spark a comeback. Their 64-win pedigree demands resilience, but injuries and fatigue loom large. A loss ends their season; a win reignites hope for a deep run.
Explore More: Texans vs Kansas City Chiefs match player stats
Conclusion: Pacers Vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
The Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats underscore a matchup that blended high drama with one-sided execution, as the Indiana Pacers’ 129-109 dismantling of the Cleveland Cavaliers on May 11, 2025, stands as a pivotal playoff turning point. Powered by Haliburton’s brilliance and a barrage of threes, Indiana affirmed their contender status, while Cleveland grapples with star-driven limitations. As the series heads back to Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse, expect fireworksâbut if the Pacers sustain this form, the Cavs’ season could end prematurely. Basketball at its finest: pace, space, and unyielding heart. Stay tuned for Game 5âthe
FAQs: Pacers vs. Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
1. What was the final score of the Pacers vs. Cavaliers game on May 11, 2025?
The Indiana Pacers defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 129-109 in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals on May 11, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.
2. How does this game affect the series outlook?
The Pacersâ 129-109 win gave them a 3-1 series lead, putting them one victory away from the Eastern Conference Finals. The Cavaliers face elimination in Game 5 at home, needing adjustments to their perimeter defense and bench production to extend the series.
3. How did the Pacers dominate the game statistically?
The Pacers shot 54.5% from the field and 51.4% from three (18/35), compared to the Cavaliersâ 44.6% and 31.3% (10/32). Indiana also forced 18 turnovers, scored 32 fast-break points, and had 42 bench points, outpacing Cleveland in nearly every key metric.
4. Why did the Cavaliers struggle in this game?
Cleveland struggled due to poor three-point shooting (10/32), 18 turnovers, and a lack of offensive support for Donovan Mitchell. Their defense, typically elite, allowed 129 pointsâthe most in their playoff runâparticularly faltering in transition (32 fast-break points allowed) and against Indianaâs hot three-point shooting.
5. What role did the Pacersâ bench play in the victory?
The Pacersâ bench was a game-changer, contributing 42 points, led by Obi Toppin (18 points) and T.J. McConnell (10 points, 4 assists). Their energy, hustle (12 offensive rebounds), and +15 plus/minus from Toppin helped sustain Indianaâs lead and outmatched Clevelandâs reserves, who scored only 28 points.
6. How did Tyrese Haliburton impact the game?
Haliburton orchestrated Indianaâs offense with 28 points, 12 assists, and 6 three-pointers on 54.5% shooting. His quick hands (3 steals) and zero turnovers in crunch time disrupted Clevelandâs rhythm and set the tone for Indianaâs fast-paced attack.
7. What were the key defensive stats for both teams?
- Pacers: Recorded 12 steals and 6 blocks, with Myles Turner (3 blocks) anchoring the paint and Haliburton (3 steals) disrupting passing lanes.
- Cavaliers: Managed 7 steals and 4 blocks but were outrebounded 48-42 and allowed 18 three-pointers, exposing perimeter and transition defensive weaknesses.
