New Orleans Pelicans vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats

The hardwood heated up on November 9, 2025, when the San Antonio Spurs hosted the New Orleans Pelicans in what became an absolute thriller at the Frost Bank Center. This New Orleans Pelicans vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats showcase tells the story of a high-scoring affair that kept fans on their feet until the final buzzer, with the Spurs ultimately prevailing 126-119. Both teams came into this contest hungry for a win, and the offensive firepower on display didn’t disappoint, as star players traded buckets in a game that featured multiple lead changes and momentum swings that had the crowd roaring throughout all four quarters.

Player statistics for the San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans game show more nuanced plots than the outcome, especially the conflict between the teams’ use of youthful superstars and seasoned players. While Brandon Ingram and CJ McCollum handled the offensive load for New Orleans in Zion Williamson’s absence due to a persistent hamstring injury, Victor Wembanyama continued to dominate for San Antonio in his sophomore campaign. In a game that had major early-season ramifications, the clash also included thrilling defensive chess matches, fast-break possibilities, and clutch shooting in the closing minutes that eventually separated these Western Conference rivals.

Key Players and Teams Who Took the Field

Teams and Key Players

The roster makeup for this game brought to light the disparities in these two teams’ approaches. Wembanyama was San Antonio’s main source of generational talent, and his mobility caused matchup problems all game long. The Spurs’ supporting group came through with timely defensive plays and effective shooting. Ingram and McCollum took on more playing time and scoring duties for New Orleans as a result of Zion’s absence, and they both rose to the occasion with forceful offensive efforts.

Game Details

Both teams had to contend with this regular season matchup as they made their way through the fiercely tough Western Conference. Spurs supporters united around their youthful core, creating an electrifying atmosphere inside the Frost Bank Center. San Antonio used the game to test the depth of their squad and gain early momentum, while New Orleans used it to demonstrate that they could contend without their franchise star in the starting lineup.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring

This battle was extremely competitive from the first tip to the last buzzer, as evidenced by the scoring distribution across the four quarters. Prior to San Antonio’s spectacular fourth-quarter comeback, neither side was able to establish a significant lead. Because both offenses were successful against their opponents’ defensive tactics, the scoring was back and forth, which kept the crowd interested.

Additional Breakdown Details

What Was the Event?
This New Orleans Pelicans vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats come from a regular season NBA contest, the kind of game that can set the tone for a team’s entire season trajectory.

Where Was the Match Held?
The Frost Bank Center in downtown San Antonio served as the venue, providing the Spurs with home-court advantage and a raucous fanbase.

When Did It Take Place?
November 9, 2025, during the early portion of the NBA regular season when teams are still finding their identity and rhythm.

Why Was the Match Significant?
Beyond the standings implications, this game showcased two young cores competing in a loaded Western Conference, with playoff seeding potentially coming down to these head-to-head matchups later in the season.

How Did It Unfold Generally?
The game featured offensive fireworks from both squads, with San Antonio’s superior fourth-quarter execution and Wembanyama’s two-way dominance ultimately proving to be the difference-makers in a seven-point Spurs victory.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Quarter 1: Setting the Tone

Key Moments:
The offensive rhythm that would characterize the whole game was set in the first quarter. Forty-five seconds into the game, Victor Wembanyama made his presence known with a rim-rattling slam off a baseline cut. After a nice mid-range jumper from Brandon Ingram, the bucket trade started. The Spurs’ defensive vigor was demonstrated by Jeremy Sochan’s two early charges, and the Pelicans’ bench was electrified by CJ McCollum’s step-back three from the wing.

Shifts in Momentum:
San Antonio jumped out to an early 11-5 lead thanks to Wembanyama’s dominance in the paint and Devin Vassell’s perimeter shooting. However, the Pelicans countered with a 9-2 run fueled by Ingram’s aggressive drives and Jonas Valančiūnas’ physical play on the offensive glass. The quarter ended with the Spurs holding a slim 32-30 advantage, but neither team had established clear control.

Player Substitutions/Injuries:
Both coaches made numerous substitutions, with Gregg Popovich adding Sandro Mamukelashvili and Cedi Osman at the 6:30 mark to give the team new legs. In response, Willie Green added Larry Nance Jr. and Jose Alvarado in an attempt to increase the defensive tempo and intensity. During the first frame, no injuries were reported.

Notable Strategies:
The Spurs ran numerous high pick-and-roll sets with Wembanyama as the screener, creating mismatches and opening driving lanes for Tre Jones. New Orleans attacked in transition whenever possible, pushing pace after defensive rebounds to catch San Antonio’s defense before it could set up. The Pelicans also employed zone defense for three possessions, disrupting the Spurs’ offensive flow temporarily.

Quarter 1 Scoring Table

Extra Insights:
From the first tip, the Frost Bank Center audience was incredibly energetic, especially following Wembanyama’s thundering slam and his subsequent rejection of Ingram’s layup attempt. With seven combined fouls called before the first timeout, the officiating staff called the game rather tight early on. This significantly disrupted the flow of play but allowed both teams to enter the bonus scenario later in the quarter.

Quarter 2: Offensive Explosion

Key Moments:
Throughout this stanza, CJ McCollum was on fire, making four straight three-pointers in a five-minute period to put the Pelicans ahead by eight points. Popovich was forced to call a timeout and modify his defensive tactics due to his ability to make shots from beyond the arc. In response, Keldon Johnson drove hard to the hoop, drew fouls, and made five trips to the free-throw line during the quarter. As both sides shot more than 55% from the field, the back-and-forth became more intense.

Shifts in Momentum:
The Pelicans seized control midway through the quarter with their 12-0 run, sparked by McCollum’s perimeter barrage and Herb Jones’ transition dunks following Spurs turnovers. San Antonio appeared rattled, committing four turnovers in a three-minute span. However, the Spurs steadied themselves with a 7-0 counter-run in the final two minutes before halftime, featuring Vassell’s corner three-pointer and Wembanyama’s putback dunk that electrified the home crowd.

Player Substitutions/Injuries:
In order to counter New Orleans’ up-tempo style, Popovich extended his rotation, giving Blake Wesley and Malaki Branham minutes to provide energy and new legs. With Valančiūnas getting extra rest because of early foul trouble (three fouls by the 4:12 mark of the second quarter), Green maintained a tighter rotation, relying largely on McCollum’s hot hand.

Notable Strategies:
The Spurs adjusted their pick-and-roll coverage after McCollum’s hot streak, switching more aggressively and forcing the ball out of his hands. New Orleans exploited San Antonio’s aggressive perimeter defense by having Ingram attack closeouts with hard drives to the rim, drawing fouls and collapsing the defense. The Pelicans also pressed full-court after made baskets twice, creating turnovers and easy transition opportunities.

Quarter 2 Scoring Table

McCollum’s outburst and New Orleans’ ability to take advantage of San Antonio’s unusual turnover problems helped them win the second quarter by five points and go into halftime with a 63-60 lead.

Extra Insights:
The halftime score favored the Pelicans 63-60, but the game felt closer than the three-point margin suggested. The crowd remained fully engaged despite the home team trailing, recognizing they were witnessing a legitimate offensive showcase. The officials continued their tight whistle, calling 12 combined fouls in the quarter, which slowed the pace slightly but created numerous free-throw opportunities for both squads.

Quarter 3: Defensive Adjustments

Key Moments:
Victor Wembanyama scored 11 points and changed numerous rim-bound attempts during the third quarter, dominating the game on both ends of the court. He turned the tide decisively in favor of the Spurs by blocking two consecutive shots on consecutive Pelicans possessions, first blocking Ingram’s floater and then swatting Valančiūnas’ hook shot. San Antonio took their first lead since the beginning of the second quarter thanks to Vassell’s timely scoring, which included a nice mid-range pull-up jumper.

Shifts in Momentum:
The Spurs opened the second half with renewed defensive intensity, holding the Pelicans to just 27 points for the quarter. San Antonio’s defensive adjustments included more help-side rotations and denying Ingram’s preferred left-hand drives to the basket. The Spurs regained the lead at the 7:42 mark on a Tre Jones floater and never trailed again in the quarter, building their advantage to six points heading into the final frame.

Player Substitutions/Injuries:
Both managers reduced the length of their rotations and mostly used their starting lineups with few substitutions. Popovich recognized Wembanyama’s defensive impact and kept him on the field for almost the whole quarter (11 minutes). Green tried to respond by keeping Ingram and McCollum together for long stretches of time, but the Pelicans’ frontcourt rotation was hampered by Valančiūnas’ foul problems (his fourth at the 5:30 mark).

Notable Strategies:
San Antonio employed more zone defense in this quarter, particularly a 2-3 alignment that clogged driving lanes and forced New Orleans to settle for contested outside shots. The strategy proved effective as the Pelicans’ three-point shooting cooled significantly. New Orleans tried to counter by running more isolation plays for Ingram, but the Spurs sent timely double teams that forced difficult passes and turnovers.

Quarter 3 Scoring Table

The Spurs outscored the Pelicans by four points in the third quarter, taking a 91-90 lead into the final frame and seizing all the momentum with their defensive intensity and Wembanyama’s two-way excellence.

Extra Insights:
In contrast to the offensive fireworks of the first half, the defensive adjustments made by both coaching staffs produced a more gritty, physical quarter. During pivotal defensive possessions, the atmosphere was deafening as the spectators realized how important the game was. Both coaches used television timeouts to plan specific plays and make personnel changes, which felt especially deliberate. Player statistics from this quarter’s New Orleans Pelicans vs. San Antonio Spurs game showed how the Pelicans, who were lacking in depth, started to lose to San Antonio’s length and quickness.

Quarter 4: Spurs Seal Victory

Key Moments:
The Spurs dominated the first six minutes of the fourth quarter, embarking on an 18-5 run that effectively ended the game. During this period, Devin Vassell made three straight shots, including two long three-pointers that increased San Antonio’s advantage to 14 points. Brandon Ingram made tough shots to try to keep the Pelicans within striking distance, but the Spurs responded to every rally attempt. The win was decided by Wembanyama’s final free throws.

Shifts in Momentum:
After their initial surge, San Antonio dominated the rest of the quarter. The Spurs never panicked, even though New Orleans narrowed the gap to eight points with 3:42 left after a three-pointer from McCollum and a clutch layup from Ingram. Any thoughts of a comeback were essentially dashed when Keldon Johnson’s offensive rebound and putback increased the deficit back to double figures.

Player Substitutions/Injuries:
Both coaches cleared their benches, giving end-of-rotation players crucial minutes as the game was determined in the final two minutes. For the last ninety seconds, Popovich substituted veteran Devonte’ Graham and rookie Sidy Cissoko. Dyson Daniels and Matt Ryan, who both saw little action throughout the game, were given playing time by Green.

Notable Strategies:
The Spurs executed their half-court offense with precision, getting high-percentage looks through screening actions and player movement. They also controlled the pace, preventing New Orleans from getting out in transition and forcing the Pelicans into uncomfortable half-court possessions. The Pelicans were forced to foul late, sending San Antonio to the free-throw line repeatedly, where they converted 11 of 14 attempts in the final four minutes.

Quarter 4 Scoring Table

Extra Insights:
The Spurs demonstrated championship-level closing abilities in the fourth quarter, remaining composed and playing basic basketball when the game was on the line. Sensing their team was about to make a statement, the crowd went into overdrive on the first run. As the Pelicans’ main players grew weary, it became more and more obvious that they lacked depth without Zion Williamson. Following more than three quarters of carrying such huge offensive loads, Ingram and McCollum appeared physically worn out. Player statistics from the San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans game made it very evident how San Antonio’s deeper rotation and well-balanced offense won the game.

Highlight Standout Performances

Star Players and Their Stats

The whole image of how the game played out was painted by these individual performances. Vassell’s effective shooting kept defenders honest on the perimeter, while Wembanyama’s stat line demonstrated his unicorn-like ability to influence every aspect of the game. Together, Ingram and McCollum scored 57 points for the Pelicans, which was almost half of their team’s total score. This demonstrated both their skill and the pressure they face in the absence of more elite players.

Shooting Percentages

San Antonio has an efficiency advantage in all three areas, as shown by the shooting percentages. In the fourth quarter, when games are frequently decided at the charity stripe, the Spurs’ superior free-throw shooting was especially useful. Wembanyama was able to operate inside the appropriate spacing thanks to their three-point accuracy, which was enhanced by Vassell’s five makes.

Assists, Steals, Blocks

The Spurs’ advantage in ball movement (28 assists) demonstrated their superior offensive execution and willingness to find the open man. Their defensive disruption metrics (9 steals, 7 blocks) showcased their length and athleticism, with Wembanyama accounting for four of those blocks himself. These hustle stats often separate winning and losing teams in closely contested games.

Clutch Moments:
The outcome of this player statistics summary of the New Orleans Pelicans vs. San Antonio Spurs game was determined by a number of clutch performances. When his side needed separation, Devin Vassell’s three straight field goals to start the fourth quarter effectively put an end to the game’s competitive part. The Pelicans had a lead at the half thanks to a surge of momentum from CJ McCollum’s four consecutive three-pointers in the second quarter, which kept them within striking distance. The home fans and his teammates were invigorated by Victor Wembanyama’s defensive plays, especially his back-to-back blocks in the third quarter, which caused the game to swing decisively.

Leadership and Teamwork:
Beyond individual statistics, leadership moments shaped the game’s narrative. Chris Paul, though not in the starting lineup for this game due to rest, provided crucial veteran guidance from the bench, coaching up younger Spurs players during timeouts. For the Pelicans, Brandon Ingram’s vocal leadership kept his teammates engaged despite trailing in the fourth quarter, constantly encouraging and organizing the offense. The Spurs’ ball movement and willingness to make the extra pass reflected a team-first culture that Popovich has cultivated throughout his legendary coaching career. The visible chemistry between Wembanyama and his teammates, particularly on defensive rotations and help-side defense, highlighted San Antonio’s growth as a cohesive unit.

Key Statistics

Final Score

The seven-point margin accurately reflected San Antonio’s superior execution in the decisive fourth quarter, though the game remained competitive throughout.

Total Points and Rebounds

The Spurs controlled the glass, outrebounding New Orleans by six overall. This rebounding advantage, though modest, proved crucial in limiting second-chance opportunities for the Pelicans and controlling possession tempo throughout the contest.

Turnovers

Ball security tilted slightly in San Antonio’s favor, with the Pelicans’ three additional turnovers leading to extra possessions and transition opportunities for the Spurs. New Orleans’ turnover issues intensified under pressure, particularly during San Antonio’s fourth-quarter surge.

Time of Possession (Estimated)

Based on pace and possession counts, the Spurs controlled the ball slightly longer, reflecting their ability to execute in half-court settings and control the tempo down the stretch. This possession advantage allowed them to dictate the game’s rhythm.

Steals, Blocks, and Defensive Impact

San Antonio’s length advantage and capacity to obstruct passing lanes were demonstrated by their defensive activity measures. The Pelicans were forced to make challenging rim-dwelling attempts since Wembanyama’s presence alone changed multiple shoots outside of his four official blocks.

Total Yards Comparison (Basketball Adaptation)

Wembanyama’s inside presence helped the Spurs dominate the paint, outscoring the Pelicans by eight points in that vital area. San Antonio’s bench performance gave them a sizable eight-point advantage that was useful during rotation minutes, even if New Orleans had a slight advantage in transition points. Player statistics from the San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans game show where each team found offensive success and where changes were required.

Quotes or Reactions

Victor Wembanyama (Spurs Center):

“Tonight was about imposing our will defensively in the second half. We knew they would come out aggressive without Zion, so Brandon and CJ would have the ball in their hands a lot. In the third quarter, we just tried to make everything difficult for them, contest every shot, and protect the rim. When we defend like that, we’re tough to beat.”

Gregg Popovich (Spurs Head Coach):

“I thought our guys showed real maturity in the fourth quarter. We didn’t panic when they made their run, we just stuck to our principles. Devin gave us huge minutes when we needed scoring, and Victor was Victor doing everything on both ends. But this was a team win. Everybody contributed.”

Brandon Ingram (Pelicans Forward):

“We competed hard tonight. Obviously, it hurts to come up short, but I’m proud of how we fought without Z. CJ got hot in that second quarter and gave us life. We just couldn’t get enough stops in the fourth when they went on that run. Credit to them, they executed when it mattered.”

CJ McCollum (Pelicans Guard):

“Those four threes I hit in the second felt great. I was in rhythm, seeing the ball go through the hoop. But basketball is a 48-minute game. They made adjustments defensively, started switching more, and we couldn’t sustain our offense in the fourth quarter. That’s what championship-level teams do they adjust and execute.”

Devin Vassell (Spurs Guard):

“Coach told me to stay aggressive in the fourth. They were focusing so much attention on Victor that I was getting clean looks. I just knocked them down. My teammates found me, and I was able to deliver when the team needed me. That’s what we’re building here everybody being ready for their moment.”

Post-Game Reaction Summary Table

These responses encapsulated the key components that shaped the player statistics story of the New Orleans Pelicans vs. San Antonio Spurs game: San Antonio’s defensive adjustments, clutch play, and balanced scoring in contrast to New Orleans’ heroic effort despite being undermanned.

Match Analysis

What Went Right & Wrong

San Antonio Spurs – What Went Right:

• Victor Wembanyama’s Two-Way Dominance: His 34-point, 12-rebound, 4-block performance showcased why he’s considered a generational talent. His ability to score efficiently while protecting the rim changed the game’s complexion.
• Fourth Quarter Execution: The Spurs’ 18-5 run to open the final frame demonstrated championship-level composure and execution. Ball movement, defensive rotations, and timely scoring all clicked simultaneously.
• Balanced Scoring Attack: Five Spurs players scored in double figures, preventing New Orleans from focusing defensive attention on any single player. This depth proved crucial during rotation minutes.
• Defensive Adjustments: After allowing 63 first-half points, San Antonio’s coaching staff made critical adjustments, holding the Pelicans to 56 second-half points through scheme changes and increased intensity.

San Antonio Spurs – What Went Wrong:

• Second Quarter Turnovers: The four turnovers in a three-minute span during the second quarter allowed the Pelicans to seize momentum and take a halftime lead. Better ball security would have prevented New Orleans’ confidence-building run.
• Perimeter Defense (First Half): CJ McCollum’s four consecutive three-pointers exposed San Antonio’s pick-and-roll coverage and closeout discipline. Tighter rotations earlier might have prevented his hot streak.

New Orleans Pelicans – What Went Right:

• Brandon Ingram’s Leadership: Stepping into the primary scorer role, Ingram delivered 31 points on efficient shooting while facilitating for teammates. His ability to create offense under pressure kept the Pelicans competitive.
• Second Quarter Surge: The 12-0 run that gave New Orleans a halftime lead showcased their offensive firepower and ability to punish turnovers in transition. This stretch proved they could compete despite missing Zion.
• Three-Point Shooting (First Half): Converting 10 of 19 three-point attempts in the first half (52.6%) kept pressure on San Antonio’s defense and created necessary spacing for drives to the basket.

New Orleans Pelicans – What Went Wrong:

• Fourth Quarter Collapse: The disastrous opening six minutes of the final quarter, when San Antonio went on their decisive 18-5 run, essentially ended the game. Fatigue and lack of depth became painfully apparent.
• Missing Zion Williamson: The absence of their franchise player meant Ingram and McCollum carried unsustainable offensive burdens. Without a third primary creator, the Pelicans became predictable and easier to defend.
• Defensive Rebounding: Allowing 12 offensive rebounds gave San Antonio extra possessions and second-chance points. Better box-out discipline could have limited these opportunities.
• Valančiūnas’ Foul Trouble: His four fouls disrupted New Orleans’ frontcourt rotation and forced smaller lineups that Wembanyama exploited mercilessly in the paint.

Offensive/Defensive Successes or Failures Analysis

Offensive Analysis:

San Antonio’s balanced strategy and New Orleans’ dependence on perimeter talent were contrasted offensively. It turned out to be the difference between the Spurs’ ability to score inside-out and the Pelicans’ reliance on challenging outside shooting.

Defensive Analysis:

Player statistics from both ends of the New Orleans Pelicans vs. San Antonio Spurs game show how San Antonio’s length, athleticism, and adjustments outplayed a depleted Pelicans team in key situations.

Read Also: Miami Heat vs Brooklyn Nets Match Player Stats

Controversial Calls or Game-Changing Moments

Key Controversial Moments:

• Jonas Valančiūnas’ Third Foul (Q2, 4:12 remaining): A charge call against the Pelicans center sent him to the bench with three fouls, disrupting New Orleans’ frontcourt rotation. Replays showed the contact could have gone either way, with the defensive player possibly still sliding into position. This call significantly impacted the Pelicans’ ability to match up with Wembanyama in the second half.
• Potential Goal-Tending (Q3, 7:15 remaining): A Wembanyama block on Brandon Ingram’s layup attempt appeared close to being on its downward trajectory. Officials ruled it clean, but Pelicans players and coaches protested immediately. Had the call gone the other way, it would have been a two-point swing in a game ultimately decided by seven.
• Technical Foul on Willie Green (Q4, 8:30 remaining): The Pelicans coach earned a technical for arguing what he perceived as inconsistent officiating after a no-call on contact during a CJ McCollum drive. The technical gave San Antonio a free throw and possession, coming during their decisive run.

Game-Changing Moments Beyond Officiating:

• Wembanyama’s Consecutive Blocks (Q3): These back-to-back defensive plays completely shifted momentum and demoralized the Pelicans’ interior attack, forcing them to settle for perimeter shots.
• Devin Vassell’s Three Straight Buckets (Q4 opening): This stretch essentially ended the competitive portion of the game, extending San Antonio’s lead from two to 12 points in under three minutes.
• CJ McCollum’s Four Straight Threes (Q2): While ultimately not enough, this performance kept the Pelicans within striking distance and gave them a halftime lead to build upon.

Recent Form and Season Context

San Antonio Spurs Season Trajectory:

After a poor start to the season, the Spurs came into this game with a lot of enthusiasm. San Antonio appeared to be a serious postseason contender as Wembanyama continued to build rapport with his teammates and the young core gained experience. Their early-season record was enhanced by this win, which also showed that they can finish difficult games against strong opponents, a weakness that have dogged them in past years.

New Orleans Pelicans Season Challenges:

The Pelicans were navigating early-season adversity with Zion Williamson’s lingering hamstring issues limiting his availability. This matchup exemplified their season-long challenge: competing without their best player while asking Ingram and McCollum to carry unsustainable offensive loads. Their competitive performance despite the absence showed resilience, but the loss highlighted why Zion’s health remains paramount to their playoff aspirations.

Head-to-Head History Context:

These opponents from the Western Conference have a recent track record of being competitive, with games frequently relying on fourth-quarter play. While New Orleans’ competitive performance without Zion showed they have potential beyond their injured star, San Antonio’s victory in this game without Chris Paul in the starting lineup showed their growing depth. At the end of the regular season, these head-to-head outcomes may determine the clubs’ postseason standings.

Strategic Takeaways

For San Antonio:

• Continue building offensive schemes around Wembanyama’s versatility as both screener and finisher
• Maintain defensive intensity for full 48 minutes rather than allowing first-half lapses
• Leverage depth advantage during regular season to keep stars fresh for playoff runs

For New Orleans:

• Urgently need Zion’s return to provide third scoring option and interior presence
• Must develop better ball movement to prevent over-reliance on Ingram/McCollum isolation
• Consider defensive scheme adjustments to better protect the rim without elite shot-blocking presence

Conclusion

The New Orleans Pelicans vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats tell the complete story of a thrilling 126-119 Spurs victory that highlighted Victor Wembanyama’s generational talent and San Antonio’s superior execution when it mattered most. While the New Orleans Pelicans vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats showed Brandon Ingram and CJ McCollum’s valiant 57-point combined effort, the absence of Zion Williamson proved too significant to overcome against a deeper, more balanced Spurs roster. The decisive fourth-quarter surge an 18-5 run that essentially sealed the outcome demonstrated San Antonio’s championship-level composure under pressure.

Player statistics from the New Orleans Pelicans vs. San Antonio Spurs game provide important information for both teams going ahead. The Pelicans’ performance highlighted the pressing need for Zion’s return to give a third scoring option and interior presence, while the Spurs demonstrated their ability to defeat elite opponents and contend for postseason spots in a crowded Western Conference. With playoff seeding perhaps on the line and this November encounter acting as a crucial yardstick for both teams’ championship hopes, the stakes will probably be even higher when these teams play again later this season.

FAQs 

Q: What was the final score of the Pelicans vs Spurs game?

A: The San Antonio Spurs defeated the New Orleans Pelicans 126-119 on November 9, 2025.

Q: Who were the top performers in the Pelicans-Spurs matchup?

A: Victor Wembanyama led San Antonio with 34 points and 12 rebounds, while Brandon Ingram paced New Orleans with 31 points. Devin Vassell added 28 for the Spurs, and CJ McCollum scored 26 for the Pelicans.

Q: Why wasn’t Zion Williamson playing for the Pelicans?

A: Zion Williamson missed the game due to a lingering hamstring injury, forcing Brandon Ingram and CJ McCollum to carry heavier offensive loads.

Q: What was the key moment that decided the game?

A: San Antonio’s 18-5 run to open the fourth quarter proved decisive, turning a one-point game into a 14-point lead that New Orleans couldn’t overcome.

Q: How did Victor Wembanyama impact the game defensively?

A: Wembanyama recorded four blocks and altered numerous additional shots, particularly his back-to-back rejections in the third quarter that shifted momentum completely toward the Spurs.

Q: Where was the Pelicans vs Spurs game played?

A: The game took place at the Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, giving the Spurs home-court advantage with an energetic crowd of 18,354.

Q: How many three-pointers did CJ McCollum make?

A: CJ McCollum connected on six three-pointers, including four consecutive makes during his hot second-quarter stretch that gave the Pelicans a halftime lead.

Q: What were the shooting percentages for both teams?

A: San Antonio shot 51.8% from the field, 41.7% from three, and 83.3% from the free-throw line. New Orleans shot 49.3% from the field, 38.9% from three, and 78.6% from the line.